If you’ve been online in the last few days, you may have seen a piece on CNN’s iReport which describes the extreme sexual harassment author Michaela Cross received while studying abroad in India. Cross was so traumatized by her ordeal that she was diagnosed with PTSD after she came back to America. She is currently on medical leave from the University of Chicago, and unable to attend any classes.
Michaela Cross’s story is but one of many stories that have come out in the last few months about how dangerous it is to be a woman in India. India’s problem with women first attracted the world’s attention with the December 16 rape case, when a young woman was viciously gang-raped on a bus in Delhi. That incident attracted worldwide attention as Indians all over the country rose up in protest of the nation’s rape culture. Since then, more stories have come out from women who have been harassed while in India. We heard about the Swedish tourist who was raped by six men while she and her husband were camping in the woods and the British woman who leaped out of a three-story building in order to escape a rapist. And now we have Cross’s story; the account of harassment so extreme that it sparked a mental illness.
Notice what these accounts have in common? Since the world became aware of India’s rape addiction, the only incidents that seem to raise any hackles outside India seem to be those that target foreign tourists. One could very easily forget that it is Indian women who are the primary victims of India’s rape culture. It is hard to know what the real numbers are — rapes are drastically under-reported in India — but given that 95 percent of Delhi women report feeling unsafe when they leave the house, we can assume that they are very high. A whopping 51 percent of Delhi men admit to committing acts of sexual violence, and 78 percent of men have actually witnessed sexual assault taking place. Of those witnesses, only 15 percent have intervened. The numbers paint a pretty clear picture — but for anyone not yet convinced, talk to any Indian woman, and they’ll tell you about the lengths they go to in order to avoid male attention. Every Indian woman has stories of eve-teasing and unwanted groping received in a public place.
I bring attention to the disparity because there is a vicious tendency, in our culture, to only acknowledge the victimhood of white women, at the expense of women of color. I’m worried that by ignoring what Indian women go through, we continue to reinforce the idea that the experiences of Indian women don’t matter as much as those of white women. A good friend of mine was diagnosed with depression after enduring years of sexual harassment on Delhi buses — where are the legions of men writing to her, apologizing for the vicious behavior of their counterparts? Why do Indian women have to fight to be recognized, when all a white woman has to do to go viral is to make a single post?
Furthermore, when we fail to pay attention to Indian women, we run the risk of only thinking about how to protect foreign women from sexual assault when traveling in India. We begin to offer idiotic solutions to the rape problem: “just don’t go to India,” says an internet commenter. And what exactly are those women already in India supposed to do? Leave?
None of this is Michaela Cross’s fault, of course. She has every right to speak up about her experiences, and it is to her credit that she’s come away with anything positive to say about her trip to India. Still, the burden is not on her to contextualize her own experience with sexual assault — that falls on us, her readers. We have to keep in mind that the situation is a little more complicated than it seems to be in Cross’s article. Not every Indian man is a rapist or an eve-teaser. For every man that gropes or leers, there is another who will kindly give you directions without trying anything funny. We also can’t forget the male allies who came out in force after the Delhi rape case to protest against India’s rape culture. A student that attended the same study abroad program as Cross wrote her own iReport in which she points out that generalization about the “nature” of Indian men leads to racism — and we have to be very careful to avoid it.
Michaela Cross is a victim of horrific abuse, and we wish her all the best in her recovery. But we can’t forget the millions of Indian women who face the same thing, every day.
Jaya Sundaresh lives in Hartford, Connecticut. She grew up in various parts of the Northeast before deciding to study political science at McGill University. Follow her on Twitter at @anedumacation and read her thoughts on her personal blog.
Does this story not count? http://edition.cnn.com/2013/08/13/world/asia/india-rape?
Or this one? http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/23/world/asia/india-mumbai-photographer-gangrape/index.html?hpt=hp_t3. How about this one? http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/13/world/asia/india-new-gang-rape
No, they don’t count. They didn’t recieve the same kind of reaction that these stories do.
Do you have #’s of media mentions to back that up?
…. It’s pretty obvious. We’re talking about this case, we’re not talking about the others. I think you’re reaching, man.
With air-tight logic like that, I guess you’re right.
Who is “we”? This blog? That determine what the media cares about?
I get most of my news from the NYT. Zero mentions of Michaela Cross on there (and I’m not just going based on vague impressions — I actually ran a search the website). Despite having “been online in the last few days” for several hours each day, I’d never heard of her until I saw this blog post. When I searched Google News for her name just now, I got a grand total of 26 results, many from blogs I’ve never heard of.
(Also, iReport is a marginal media effort by CNN to get more eyeballs without having to pay for serious reporting.)
Meanwhile, when I search Google News for Delhi gang rape, there are hundreds of results for the same time period, scores of which are from mainstream non-Indian publications. Here’s a sample:
http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2013/08/22/delhi-gang-rape-trial-where-it-stands/
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/26/world/asia/two-more-arrests-made-in-gang-rape-in-india.html
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130827/defence-begins-final-arguments-delhi-gang-rape-case
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/08/23/asaram-bapu-delhi-gang-rape-victim-investigated-rape-girl-16_n_3803008.html?utm_hp_ref=uk
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/suspects-mumbai-brutal-gang-rape-photojournalist-arrested-article-1.1436483
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-23806871
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/26/us-india-rape-idUSBRE97P0L020130826
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/12/delhi-gang-rape-death-transformed-lives
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/25/mumbai-gang-rape-victim-suspects-arrested-_n_3811674.html (actually an AP story)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/24/mumbai-gang-rape-victim-message_n_3809928.html
http://thepeninsulaqatar.com/india/250620-delhi-gang-rape-case-close-to-wrapping-up.html
So there’s a publication in QATAR that cares about Indian women being raped in India. No mention on that website of Michaela Cross either.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/08/24/deadly-delhi-gang-rape-inspires-award-winning-play/
I’m talking about incidents of rape that have occurred after the Delhi rape case — when the world suddenly started paying attention to India’s rape problem. The most prominent rape cases that have taken place after the December 16th incident are: the Swedish tourist who was gang-raped, the British woman who jumped out of a window to escape her attacker, and this case, which I’m including because it has gone viral in India, even if i hasn’t reached the mainstream media yet. Most incidents of sexual harassment and rape do not inspire a plethora of editorials and reactions, most cases of rape do not inspire the same level of outrage that the Delhi bus case inspired — unless it involves a white woman. Then you can rest assured that the blogosphere is going to be talking about it.
But several of the links I provided above are about the photojournalist in Mumbai who was gang-raped recently. Again, thousands of results in Google news for “Mumbai rape” — sample of the non-Indian ones:
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/2013/08/29/07/08/mumbai-gang-rape-victim-leaves-hospital
http://world.time.com/2013/08/27/mumbai-gang-rape-victim-improves-may-go-home/
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/08/25/20180238-rape-is-not-the-end-of-life-says-defiant-mumbai-gang-sex-attack-victim?lite
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/25/world/asia/india-gang-rape-arrest
http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/25/grim-world-of-mumbai-rape-accused/
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/08/23/20146740-yet-another-india-gang-rape-manhunt-after-photojournalist-is-attacked-in-mumbai?lite
http://world.time.com/2013/08/23/not-again-a-gang-rape-in-mumbai-leaves-india-reeling/
http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/26/outside-mumbai-reports-of-rape-buried-in-pages-of-newspapers/?_r=0 says the Mumbai rape got lots of attention, whereas rapes elsewhere in India have gotten much less.
“because it has gone viral in India” — but your post says, “Notice what these accounts have in common? Since the world became aware of India’s rape addiction, the only incidents that seem to raise any hackles ***outside India*** seem to be those that target foreign tourists.”
When you said in the post, “I bring attention to the disparity because there is a vicious tendency, in our culture, to only acknowledge the victimhood of white women, at the expense of women of color,” I assumed the “our culture” in question was US or at least Western English-speaking culture. If you meant INDIAN culture only cares about white women, then that’s a dramatically more troubling observation than what I thought you’d been saying. (Obv bad for US to care only about white women, but at least whites are majority here, whereas they’re not worth counting as a minority in India even if you counted tourists, relative to 1 billion brown Indians.)
her point is that victims not from india have a much greater range of outreach. the world feels more comfortably situated having distant outrage and dismay towards a country and its society than it does actually examining how that society might effect the very women living in it. none of the articles you cited are articles that have reached the kind of widespread attention we’re discussing here. of course it’s important to examine any victims of assault, but that doesn’t mean we get to pick and choose which ones we support and which ones we forget. indian women are largely forgotten in this discussion, and it’s our own fault for only seeking awareness in palatable places.
So…what numbers do you have to back up your claim that certain victims are getting more press than others? If you’re not using media mentions or a quantifiable figure other than “my gut tells me”, then you’re just making stuff up.
The number of shares are clearly visible on almost every page on the Internet. This particular iReport has over 105K shares. The first CNN report you provided only has a few thousand. It’s pretty simple.
shares ≠ media mentions
Good article. Nothing is brought attention to unless a white person is wronged or uncomfortable.
“A good friend of mine was diagnosed with depression after enduring years
of sexual harassment on Delhi buses — where are the legions of men
writing to her, apologizing for the vicious behavior of their
counterparts?”
Did your friend go public with her experience? Did she post an account on a popular website? Part of your answer may be right there.
Also, have you noticed how much attention the Indian diplomat who was arrested got? What about Americans who are arrested on similar charges and subjected to the same indignities? Do they get any publicity?
I’m not saying that there aren’t racist impulses at work here, but I think you could make a better case for that.